An afternoon after the contentious Waqf (Modification) Invoice 2024 was once referred to a joint parliamentary committee following considerations raised by way of a number of opposition contributors, the Lok Sabha on Friday followed a movement naming 31 contributors to the panel to check the proposed law.
As according to the movement moved by way of Parliamentary Affairs minister Kiren Rijiju, the joint committee to inspect the Waqf (Modification) Invoice 2024 may have 21 contributors from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha. The panel will put up its ultimate file all the way through the subsequent Parliament consultation.
Here is a record of contributors from Lok Sabha at the joint parliamentary committee:
- Jagdambika Friend (BJP)
- Nishikant Dubey (BJP)
- Tejasvi Surya (BJP)
- Aparajita Sarangi (BJP)
- Sanjay Jaiswal (BJP)
- Dilip Saikia (BJP)
- Abhikit Gangopadhyay (BJP)
- DK Aruna (BJP)
- Gaurav Gogoi (Congress)
- Imran Masood (Congress)
- Mohd Jawed (Congress)
- Maulana Mohibullah (SP)
- Kalyan Banerjee (TMC)
- A Raja (DMK)
- Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu (TDP)
- Dileshwar Kamait (JDU)
- Arvind Sawant (Shiv Sena – UBT)
- Suresh Mhatre (NCP-Sharad Pawar)
- Naresh Mhaske (Shiv Sena)
- Arun Bharti (Lok Janshakti Birthday celebration-Ram Vilas)
- Asaduddin Owaisi (AIMIM)
The arguable invoice was once presented in Lok Sabha on Thursday and shortly despatched to a joint parliamentary panel after it sparked intense dialogue within the Decrease Space.
Whilst the federal government claims that the proposed amendments within the Waqf Invoice don’t seem to be supposed to intrude with the operations of mosques, opposition events have expressed considerations, viewing the invoice as a focused measure in opposition to the Muslim neighborhood and an infringement on constitutional rights.
Whilst the Lok Sabha followed a movement naming 21 of its contributors to be a part of the committee, the Rajya Sabha has been requested to call 10 of its ministers to serve at the panel.
WHAT IS WAQF (AMENDMENT) BILL 2024?
The Waqf (Modification) Invoice goals to streamline the way of registration of waqf homes thru a central portal. The Invoice proposes renaming the Waqf Act, 1995, because the Unified Waqf Control, Empowerment, Potency and Construction Act.
The time period “waqf” refers to any assets this is completely devoted for non secular or charitable functions beneath Islamic legislation. As soon as a assets is designated as waqf, it can’t be revoked or transferred. The amendments to the Invoice goal to take on this factor.
OPPOSITION ON WAQF BILL
A number of opposition events, together with Congress, Samajwadi Birthday celebration, Trinamool Congress and others, have alleged that the invoice is anti-constitutional and goals at no longer permitting Muslims to control their very own affairs and procure and administer assets.
The opposition MPs, most commonly from the INDIA bloc, mentioned that the Waqf (Modification) Invoice 2024 is aimed toward focused on Muslims with an eye fixed on upcoming meeting polls.
“It is a draconian legislation and a elementary assault at the Charter. It’s a right away assault on freedom of faith… Subsequent you’re going to opt for Christians, then Jains, then Parsis…we’re Hindu, however we appreciate different religions,” mentioned Congress MP Ok C Venugopal.
Samajwadi Birthday celebration leader Akhilesh Yadav mentioned the Invoice was once being presented to appease a handful of BJP’s hardcore supporters and was once introduced with politics in thoughts.
“What’s the level of together with non-Muslims in Waqf forums when this isn’t performed in different non secular our bodies?” Yadav requested.
In the meantime, the Indian Union Muslim League’s (IUML’s) ET Mohammed Basheer mentioned the Invoice was once in violation of Articles 14, 15, 25 26 and 30 of the Charter.
“It is part of the federal government’s grimy schedule and devise politics. If this Invoice is handed, the Waqf gadget will cave in,” he mentioned.
AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi claimed that the Space didn’t have the competence to make the amendments.
“This can be a grave assault at the elementary construction of the Charter because it violates the main of judicial independence and separation of powers,” he mentioned.
Printed By way of:
Sahil Sinha
Printed On:
Aug 9, 2024
